Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kavakli's avatar

Great post.

An alternative explanation for the steeper rise in oil prices today than in 2022 is that people expected the invasion of Ukraine to succeed quickly and the West to respond less severely. If that happened, Russia's economic isolation would be more limited (similar to the 2014 sanctions). Prices really took off as Ukraine showed a willingness to resist and Western sanctions against Russia intensified. In other words, there was a "learning" period in the 2022 case.

In contrast, no one thinks that this war is going to end quickly and scenarios involving greater disruptions to the oil markets are more likely (because of who rules the US and Iran).

Does that make sense?

Wootah's avatar

So..... the attack by the US pays for itself by the income they generated for big oil in the US? And the LNG they export to Asia and Europe? Bit like the awkward moment Russia made a killing the first period after starting a war on Ukraine.

Short-term gain, long-term loss I cannot see it any other way.

And god, I felt it was painful to see Merz sitting with Trump today. Not like Carney, being used as a lapdog. Why did Germany have to make themselves so ridiculously dependent on Russian and now American hydrocarbons. Killing their nuclear fleet, going completely wrong on their energiewende. Sigh...

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?