Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Will K's avatar

How should we think about the argument that income on financial assets is an offset to debt expense? I.e., if Japan is earning 8% on its assets and paying out 6% on its debt, isn’t that a net positive? Or does the fact that the nominal amount of liabilities > assets mean that realized income, despite potentially being higher %-wise, will not actually outpace debt servicing?

Owen Paine's avatar

This reads like you're correcting spelling mistakes

None of this is mechanical

The yen forex rate

domestic consumer product

Nominal price level

The rate paid on existing

Public debt

Japan lacks

a system wide

green platform

Instead of waltzing around

with uncle slap jack

And the uk trojan horse

Talking security

From the dragon of the far east

Turn inwa

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?