Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Peter W.'s avatar

I agree with Noel, the interventions by the US were to avoid a sell-off of US Treasuries by the BoJ and other large holders of US Treasuries like the Japanese pension plans just when the next round of new Treasuries are about to be auctioned off.

Unless (better : until) Japan has a strongly negative trade balance, the Japanese government and the BoJ have little incentive to really boost the Yen's value. The current PM has made it clear that she intends for Japan to export its way out of its current problems, and a strong Yen would impede that. And, even a single percent increase in the interest rate costs a fortune when one's debt is about 2.2 times the GDP.

Noel Keith's avatar

The interventions appear to be Bessent’s way of keeping BoJ from being forced to into large sales of US treasuries. Because Japan damn well knows it’s sitting on $1T that could reduce their debt service load to more manageable levels and allow them at least a semblance of the military buildout that the Japanese PM & electorate seem to be serious about.

In a way Bessent’s constant financial engineering that’s often driven by the non-ostensible has been the ultimate sane washing for the US economy, both fiscally and monetarily. Given that recent history of interventions I think it’s fair to assume this will not sufficiently hold up the Yen through the US election in November and we’ll be back here again soon. I wonder if they will choose a different currency as a conduit instead of the Euro? Or will they invent an even more convoluted way?

7 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?