Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Nagasaka10's avatar

What strikes me isn’t a case of “unfalsifiable, therefore true” — rather, the thesis performs the very phenomenon it describes. You argue markets shift equilibria on sentiment rather than any scientific threshold; the trouble is, whether that argument itself holds up can only be judged after the fact — which is to say, it too comes down to sentiment dressed up as science. Not a contradiction so much as a rather elegant bit of self-reference. The market, judging itself, using the market’s own methods.

Useful food for thought for the FX book. Much obliged for the sharp read.

11 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?