The US is winning the Blockade War
The US blockade is putting severe strain on Iran without blowing up global markets
Thank you for subscribing to my posts. If you’re not yet a paying subscriber, please consider becoming one. That’ll allow you to DM me with questions and comments. I plan to move my posts behind a paywall in coming months. Subscribing now locks you in at a low rate. Thank you so much for your support and feedback!
The US blockade of Iran has two goals: (i) put pressure on Iran’s economy to bring the regime back to the negotiating table in good faith; and (ii) do so without destabilizing global markets, including via a sharp rise in oil prices. I first advocated for blockading Iran in a post on March 16, when I argued that risk-reward favored doing a blockade because oil prices had already risen so much, i.e. the main cost of doing a blockade was priced in. I think that’s been broadly borne out by the past three weeks.
In last year’s tariff standoff with China, it was financial markets that were the US’ Achilles heel. The same is true now with Iran. In the first few weeks of the war, there were indications that sharply rising oil prices were destabilizing global markets, with signs of adverse spillovers into private equity. In today’s post, I’ll run through global markets and show that the picture is remarkably calm. That’s testament in my view to how skillful the rollout of the blockade has been. Keeping a lid on volatility is a key ingredient to a successful blockade because it deprives Iran of its biggest offensive weapons: instability and chaos.
My readers will know I think it’s important to compare like for like, so I compare financial markets now with how they behaved after Russia’s Ukraine invasion. The four charts above do this for the July Brent futures price (top left), the S&P 500 (top right), the Dollar versus its G10 peers (bottom left) and the Dollar versus emerging markets (bottom right). The blue line is what’s happening now and the black line is what went on in 2022. In both cases, I’ve indexed things to be 100 the day before war began, which is Feb. 23, 2022, for Ukraine and Feb. 27, 2026, for Iran. What’s striking is how much bigger the oil price shock is now, yet markets are very calm.
The four charts above are my tracking of what’s going on in options markets. They show 30-day ahead implied volatility for crude oil (top left), the S&P 500 (top right), the bond market (bottom left) and the high yield corporate debt market (bottom right). A rise in implied volatility signals increased demand for hedging as markets brace for more uncertainty. We’re clearly not at the kind of distressed levels we were at around three weeks after the start of hostilities.
Now, it’s easy to dismiss these charts as “markets are being complacent,” but I think there’s more to it than that. The US has been skillful at keeping markets calm in the face of all kinds of scare stories, notably this past week as so many were screaming about physical shortages. Between taking Iran’s oil exports down to zero and causing it serious storage and capital flight problems, the US is also winning the standoff in global financial markets, where it’s keeping a lid on volatility. That defangs Iran’s main weapon, which is global markets instability.



No, we’re not winning anything.
I definitely see the value in a well enforced blockade of Iran as a geopolitical strategy but I’m not so sure that we can do it in a tactical & operational sense. It’s clearly not an effective blockade so far:
“Of the tracked voyages, 77 (38.5 percent) were directly or indirectly linked to Iran. Notably, 61 of the ships transiting the strait were explicitly listed on international sanctions lists.”
https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/economy/2026/4/30/tracking-the-shadow-fleet-how-iran-evaded-the-us-naval-blockade-in-hormuz
Iran is defenseless except for the Straits. Obviously sufficient economic pressure has not been put upon it for it to lay down its weapon. Supposing it sees the obvious: that if it manages to keep the strait closed for a matter of months it will find itself encouraged to open it because it cannot be forced in such a short term. The US is only winning if it is changing that calculus. I don’t think the US is or can.