Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Austin Nellessen's avatar

Hi! Big fan of your work—I typically study and follow politics, so your analysis is always enlightening and makes me realize that often, at the end of the day, politics IS economics.

Quick question on the following statements, as I’m new to the field: “Both of these mean that the benefits from Brazil’s transformation are currently mostly going abroad, but this will change over time as ownership of these farms transitions into Brazilian hands. At that point, Brazil will see a structural rise in the current account and emerge as a global power.”

1) Why do you have the assumption that ownership of the farms will naturally change over time? Is this usually a trend? My thought would have been that—unless there is government pressure—this trend of foreign ownership would only maintain or grow?

2) Why does a current account surplus result in Brazil’s rise as a global power? Is it just to do with surplus capital, which you’re assuming will be reinvested in the country and lead to further attracting investment? Does account surplus TEND to correlate with growing “power”?

Again, love your work. Thanks for your time!

Fernan Arroyo Lozano's avatar

Quiénes venderán estas granjas y por que lo harán si ganan dinero con ello?

6 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?